A few filmmaker friends have emailed this article to me. Neil LaBute wrote an editorial of sorts called "The Cast System". The caption under the title reads, "When great actors are denied great roles on the stage because of their skin color, there's a problem. Even if they are white."
At first I was going to put down this deep analysis but honestly I want to go to Mike's and have some pancakes. I had a crazy night last night where some crazy guy was banging on the front door of our building at 3am. He was ringing all of the doorbells looking for someone he was fighting with. We have no idea if he actually wanted to yell at someone in our building or if he had the wrong building. We're not sure. We called the police and he went away. (They did not come fast enough in my opinion.) I was really happy that I had a friend in my buiding. We were both pretty freaked out but were able to handle it.
I am curious what you guys think about this Neil LaBute editorial. It is at the bottom of this entry. My fast analysis is that it really is a window into some feelings people have about affirmative action. I have no problem with white actors playing roles by people of color in a world where people of color get equal consideration for all roles. This is not really the world we live in. I think it's cool every once in a while when a director is trying something really provocative. I for one would pay top dollar to see this Raisin in the Sun production that LaBute wants to do with Brad Pitt. I'm not sure he's right for Walter Lee at all, forget the fact that he is white! Walter Lee has a quiet desperation that Pitt just can not convey but it would be cool to see him try.
I am not aware of all of these instances where great white actors can not play all of these roles meant for people of color. If Liev Schrieber wants to play Othello, I am pretty sure he could find an investor who would help him do that. The question would be if he would want to take the heat. And I do think that because of the dearth of roles for people of color in the theater, there is a right for there to be some heat that people have to take for taking those roles away from them. In other words, you better have a damn good reason.
LaBute's problem in this article is that he a bit too glib. Comments like, "I understand about slavery and all that ..." and "Call me crazy or mad or just plain racist (I've already been called everything else). You can even call me "nappy-headed" if you'd like — just take a look at my picture sometime. It's true. But honestly, let's not waste any more valuable time in our lives fussing about something that doesn't really matter."
This actually came up a lot when I working on the Alvin Ailey documentary. I watched a lot of archival footage for the film. In some of it, the white dancers admitted having a hard time with the fact that there were dances they could never do. One of Alvin Ailey's most famous pieces, "Cry", created for Judith Jamison in 1971, is a solo set to music by Alice Coltrane, Laura Nyro and the Voices of East Harlem and dedicated to ''all black women everywhere - especially our mothers.'' When Ailey created this piece, he stipulated that it never be danced by anyone who is not of color. It is one of the greatest solo dances ever created. If I were an amazing Ailey dancer, I would want to do that dance. It's incredible. But Ailey created Cry to highlight African American women. It is just not appropriate for a White woman to do this dance no matter how good it is.
It's hard for me to see a white performer doing a piece meant for a person of color when the piece is specifically about race and opression specific to being that ethnicity. Plus, I sort of think it would downright strange to watch Alec Baldwin in an August Wilson play or Ryan Gosling playing Booth in Suzan Lori-Parks' Topdog/Underdog.
OK, now I am having my pancakes. The Forum on the LA Times is fascinating as well. Happy Sunday!
Recent Comments