I have a love/hate relationship with Tavis Smiley. But after reading this article/interview with him about why he chose not to renew his contract with National Public Radio (NPR), I now have a great deal of respect for him:
In the weeks since Smiley's announcement, NPR has refused to fire back. A version of the show (though, of course, with a different name) will continue -- insiders say BET's Ed Gordon has the inside track as host -- but no new minority-themed shows have gotten past "the rough-sketch stage," according to NPR public relations manager Chad Campbell. Says NPR spokesman David Umansky: "We're very lucky and fortunate to have had Tavis as our founding host, and we agree that more needs to be done." That, however, will not be as easy as it sounds.
Using a term like "minority-themed" is just one example of the cluelessness of NPR. Take a look at Morning Edition. Just because a story takes place in Mexico, doesn't mean that the reporter's last name has to be Hidalgo. And I am smart enough to put together that Juan Williams does all of the stories about people of color in the U.S. And you wonder why many people of color don't even know what NPR is.
I will admit that I will miss Smiley's show mainly because he does some interviews with established black folks you haven't heard from in years. He had Robert Guilluame, of Benson fame, on the other day and I have to say that it was really nice to hear from him.
However, I do think Tavis is a little too full of himself and not as intelligent as he (or the media for that matter) would like you to think he is. And if I had to chose a poster child for the black race, I'm not sure I would pick him. But I guess that's a part of my resentment. Why does the "majority" get to decide who my posterchild is and the better question is why do I need one at all?
That seems to be why he left and a good reason at that. Until NPR puts some real resources into being more inclusive overall, one show isn't going to cut it.
Recent Comments